ewv Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 Instead of a notification for a forwarded spam ready for reporting I received a "SpamCop encountered errors" message that forwarded the spam back with the claim that it couldn't find the spam that it forwarded back to me. Copying the spam into the spamcop window generated the report normally. The message below (manually munged) is the entire error mail. The first set of headers (and repeated at the bottom) is for the forward to spamcop; the second set and following body are the original spam that was forwarded and which spamcop said it couldn't find in the message. The spam body is the display, not the original html forwarded. SpamCop encountered errors while saving spam for processing: SpamCop could not find your spam message in this email: Received: from vmx1.spamcop.net (sc-smtp1.verio.ironport.com [192.168.12.81]) by sc-app1.verio.ironport.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF44A674BD for <submit.xxxxxxxxxxxxxx[at]spam.spamcop.net>; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:07:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.chatcircuit.org (HELO yyyyyyyyy) (216.40.242.201) by vmx1.spamcop.net with ESMTP; 28 Mar 2004 18:07:03 -0800 Received: (from xxxxxxxx[at]localhost) by yyyyyyy (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i2T26aF00867; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 02:06:36 GMT Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 02:06:36 GMT From: spam Autoreporter <xxxxxxx[at]yyyyyy> Message-Id: <200403290206.i2T26aF00867[at]yyyyyy> X-Authentication-Warning: zzzzzzz:xxxx set sender to xxxx[at]yyyyyy using -f References: <96214754588764.83705.35683053[at]fable-h71.aol.com> In-Reply-To: <96214754588764.83705.35683053[at]fable-h71.aol.com> X-Filter: trapped-for: xxxxx[at]yyyyyy 852 X-spam-Report: Spamcop Subject: MC Spamcop Report Fwd 852: More efficient than via-gra To: xxxxxxxxxxx[at]spam.spamcop.net >From pawfolzwiya[at]hotmail.com Mon Mar 29 02:06:36 2004 Return-Path: <pawfolzwiya[at]hotmail.com> Received: from yyyyyyyyy (root[at]localhost) by yyyyyyyyyy (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i2T26a700849 for <xxxxxxxx[at]yyyyyyyyyy>; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 02:06:36 GMT X-ClientAddr: 217.210.117.141 Received: from JANNE (h141n2fls31o1105.telia.com [217.210.117.141]) by www.chatcircuit.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i2T26YB00843 for <xxxxxxxxx[at]yyyyyyyyyy>; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 02:06:35 GMT X-Message-Info: UPKGzNV60bOQh/qSgIRafKsAc0ieOh7A Received: from spend-l91.element.aol.com ([47.32.192.100]) by pu5-p91.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Sun, 22 Jun 2003 22:50:40 +0200 From: Darryl Kiser <pawfolzwiya[at]hotmail.com> To: xxxxxxxxxx[at]yyyyyyyyyy Subject: More efficient than via-gra Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 01:52:40 +0500 EST Message-ID: <96214754588764.83705.35683053[at]fable-h71.aol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--96841823078252670590" X-filter: trapped-for: xxxxxxxxxxx[at]yyyyyyy 852 ----96841823078252670590 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Did you know That the normal cost for Super V= kiagra is $20, per dose? We are running a hot special!! T0DAY Its only an amazing $3.00 Shipped world wide! DISC0UNT 0RDER: LINK http://mypersonalmeds.net/sv/index.php?pid=3Devaph4612 O.F.F ----96841823078252670590-- The email which triggered this auto-response had the following headers: Received: from vmx1.spamcop.net (sc-smtp1.verio.ironport.com [192.168.12.81]) by sc-app1.verio.ironport.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF44A674BD for <xxxxxxxxx[at]spam.spamcop.net>; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:07:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from zzzzzz (HELO yyyyyy) (216.40.242.201) by vmx1.spamcop.net with ESMTP; 28 Mar 2004 18:07:03 -0800 Received: (from xxxxx[at]localhost) by yyyyyyyyy (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i2T26aF00867; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 02:06:36 GMT Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 02:06:36 GMT From: spam Autoreporter <xxxxxxxxxxx[at]yyyyyyyyy> Message-Id: <200403290206.i2T26aF00867[at]yyyyyyyyyyy> X-Authentication-Warning: zzzzzzzz: xxxxx set sender to xxxxxxx[at]yyyyyy using -f References: <96214754588764.83705.35683053[at]fable-h71.aol.com> In-Reply-To: <96214754588764.83705.35683053[at]fable-h71.aol.com> X-Filter: trapped-for: xxxxxxxxx[at]yyyyyyyyy 852 X-spam-Report: Spamcop Subject: MC Spamcop Report Fwd 852: More efficient than via-gra To: xxxxxxxxxxxx[at]spam.spamcop.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff G. Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 I got nine of them last night (between 21:11:06 and 21:12:38 -0500). I sent them to JT. Since these only seem to be happening for SpamCop Email System Customers, I am moving this Topic to the SpamCop Email Forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewv Posted March 29, 2004 Author Share Posted March 29, 2004 This had nothing to do with the spamcop email system. It resulted from a forward from my server. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wazoo Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 Instead of a notification for a forwarded spam ready for reporting I believe JeffG's note / move was based on an "e-mail submittal" .. vice the paste-it-in type .. that's the "e-mail" connection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jefft Posted March 30, 2004 Share Posted March 30, 2004 I got nine of them last night (between 21:11:06 and 21:12:38 -0500). I sent them to JT. Since these only seem to be happening for SpamCop Email System Customers, I am moving this Topic to the SpamCop Email Forum. No, this actually has nothing to do with SpamCop Email. JT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff G. Posted March 30, 2004 Share Posted March 30, 2004 I'm sorry, I was mistaken. I put it back and sent the errors to Don instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.