Jump to content

C2H5OH

Memberp
  • Content Count

    517
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About C2H5OH

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

2,365 profile views
  1. C2H5OH

    "Hotmail" spam reporting stopped?

    Okay, so yesterday's spam duly arrived. This time it parsed and reported normally. https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6689197903z2d490751dc72f6177eeed2ee9a0a1629z Let's see what today brings...
  2. https://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z6689032327z78567ccc8eaf15598cc4e69ae8ef9d36z For the past few weeks I've been receiving a couple of spams a day to my Hotmail account. All have a "PDF" payload attachment (usually with a nonsense name) and all come from garbagename(AT)hotmail.com. I've reported them all, with spamcop sending reports to danorm(AT)hotmail.com. Today's second arrival followed exactly the same format, except that spamcop wouldn't report it (to danorm or anyone else). Tracking link above shows the result of my attempt. Doubtlessly tomorrow I'll have another couple to report, so I'll discover whether this was a one-off, or the new-normal. Has anyone else here suddenly been receiving spam from garbage hotmail accounts lately?
  3. Abuse contact for '193.142.146.0 - 193.142.146.255' is 'abuse[at]makut.investments' spamcop is using abuse[at]hostslick.de
  4. C2H5OH

    no TLS?

    For information; Firefox now warns whenever I try to go to forum pages. "Websites prove their identity via certificates. Firefox does not trust this site because it uses a certificate that is not valid for forum.spamcop.net. The certificate is only valid for the following names: cloudfront.net, *.cloudfront.net Error code: SSL_ERROR_BAD_CERT_DOMAIN" - Clicking through the warnings and proceeding regardless will open the forum pages.
  5. Such a high level of reports to a spammer's ISP might generate a high level of bounces. We know that spamcop won't keep sending reports that are bound to bounce (and only waste more email bandwidth). Maybe that's the reason for a high submitted:sent ratio?
  6. I'm now seeing; Abuse contact for '202.236.0.0 - 202.239.255.255' is 'hostmaster@nic.ad.jp'
  7. SpamCop is reporting to abuse[at]atjeu.com (actually devnulling as that abuse address has bounced 99 of 99 reports). ARIN advises abuse address for 69.50.208.13 is abuse[at]newtekone.com
  8. Abuse contact for '212.16.193.0 - 212.16.193.255' is 'abuse[at]vtc.ru'
  9. Abuse contact for '91.216.58.0 - 91.216.58.255' is 'abuse[at]eyona.com'
  10. SpamCop is reporting abuse from 200.160.198.170 to eduardop[at]durand.com.br. Cert.br requests that mail abuse issues should also be addressed to mail-abuse[at]cert.br
  11. Abuse contact for '148.66.128.0 - 148.66.159.255' is 'abuse[at]godaddy.com' (SpamCop resolves address to apnic)
  12. SpamCop is using abuse[at]activecampaign.com for 192.92.97.133 but reports "bounces (99 sent : 99 bounces)" then uses abuse#activecampaign.com[at]devnull.spamcop.net for statistical tracking. ARIN WHOIS data for 192.92.97.133 provides abuse address aburch[at]activecampaign.com
  13. SpamCop is using faugusto[at]netfortaleza.com.br for 189.45.79.237 Cert.br requests that mail abuse issues should also be addressed to mail-abuse[at]cert.br
  14. SpamCop is using rudmar[at]conectinfo.net.br for 186.235.79.42 Cert.br requests that mail abuse issues should also be addressed to mail-abuse[at]cert.br
  15. SpamCop is using henrique[at]cas.net.br for 170.0.124.99 Cert.br requests that mail abuse issues should also be addressed to mail-abuse[at]cert.br
×