emanmb Posted December 13, 2004 Share Posted December 13, 2004 And this is the Spamcop report on this one.... http://www.spamcop.net/sc?id=z702193389z56...5c88d8285dcc53z From Miles Sheridan Sun Dec 12 22:14:36 2004 X-Apparently-To: XXXXXXX[at]yahoo.com via 216.136.175.28; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:57:07 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [64.74.133.248] Return-Path: <spamcop[at]devnull.spamcop.net> Received: from 64.74.133.248 (EHLO vmx1.spamcop.net) (64.74.133.248) by mta329.mail.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:57:06 -0800 Received: from sc-app2.eq.ironport.com (HELO spamcop.net) (192.168.19.202) by vmx1.spamcop.net with SMTP; 12 Dec 2004 22:26:32 -0800 X-SpamCop-Return-Path: <kwacmfldqu[at]earthlink.net> Return-Path: <kwacmfldqu[at]earthlink.net> Received: from vmx1.spamcop.net (sc-smtp1.eq.ironport.com [192.168.18.81]) by sc-app2.eq.ironport.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7131A515950; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:21:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from unknown (HELO 64.74.133.248) (61.111.48.129) by vmx1.spamcop.net with SMTP; 12 Dec 2004 22:21:47 -0800 X-Message-Info: FZFFzsH8iQCV72PArFQL53NhfC982K6VLQ87euf7W Received: (from cjy9showmen[at]localhost) by fr33-hippodrome2.p9n.snet.net (0.85.05/3.91.97) id aue25ZR4d8146631; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 05:17:36 -0100 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: bhb34-candela7.if0w.snet.net: hx8invertible set sender to kwacmfldqu[at]earthlink.net using -n MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:14:36 +0400 From: "Miles Sheridan" <kwacmfldqu[at]earthlink.net> Add to Address Book Subject: The new and revollutionaary peenjs enlaargment devjce! spar To: 430102534[at]reports.spamcop.net Message-Id: <o3ott45-10964872206-36746353555807619038738931099439[at]gladden1> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--94165766035809480286" Content-Length: 1026 Get the new penjjs enlaaaregment devjcce! Right from our doctors, the new device can EXXTEND your tool and gain more inches! Enter HERE http://www.xtenders.info/in.php?id=jenna - Dr. Approved - Gain Moore Inchees! - Calculate Your New Tool Size NOW! dhabi cataclysmic cotillion bijective ecology diacritical errantry. paranoia walt nina conifer putnam cliffhang thorough fricative quid elmira thoriate prison clytemnestra. cerebral dryden egg lakehurst. incontestable therein constitutive kerosene deferral chortle contusion dna incapacitate airport transmit dharma. jejunum indignity nullstellensatz suntan circumscribe suspect man veridic battleground egress alberta barometer cornea. take me uff hither acton teleology nymphomania newark adenosine demure morpheme sociometry ketchup apple. scapula tarpaulin delectate corrosion publication vortex adrienne hypothalamic. cube clonic ri spurge sudden city asplenium. sturm antaeus spurious carbide wretch ribosome cardamom dither. beard ovenbird corpus blackstone quit incautious bright staff. consultant crystalline administrable inholding shrine nbs residuum suffice. blown glum jowly tariff gallinule gumdrop earthenware germantown traitor broadway cider. downward cesium planetary scalp mew epicurean ellipsoid. grotesque colonial cuprous epimorphism. twice intransigent millennium scripture debbie hazard coronate counterproposal electress blood credulity windowpane candlelight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidT Posted December 13, 2004 Share Posted December 13, 2004 ...but AFAICT, it's not "spam from Spamcop" at all. Looks like it is spam that was sent from a "shinbiro.com" source to an address SpamCop put on your outgoing reports, and then relayed to your Yahoo.com address. Or am I missing something here? DT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wazoo Posted December 13, 2004 Share Posted December 13, 2004 Perhaps see Don's last post at http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=3206 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidT Posted December 13, 2004 Share Posted December 13, 2004 Yes, that explains it, but it's still not really "spam from Spamcop" ... it is some sort of glitch with spam being relayed through expired reporting addresses. dt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dra007 Posted December 13, 2004 Share Posted December 13, 2004 I am puzzled, so where is this <<glitch>>? I also get spams with spamcop domain being forged. Is a spammer cleverly spamming/targetting SC users? In that case this topic/question has been raised many times before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emanmb Posted December 13, 2004 Author Share Posted December 13, 2004 I didn't think it came from Spamcop, as the details in the report showed, but found it amusing that someone had forged a Spamcop addy. Was a new one on me! e Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.