ClayRabbit Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 abuse[at] adress is updated a few days ago: http://www.abuse.net/lookup.phtml?DOMAIN=ruweb.net But SpamCop is still using the wrong address: http://www.spamcop.net/sc?action=showroute...19;typecodes=17 How to update it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wazoo Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=4082 for starters. Noting that the RIPE data for this IP block doesn't list the abuse address. Compare the WHOIS output for the IP (block) in question .. compare that to the data seen when looking up your posting IP address .. which then leads to the question ... what is your affiliation to the IP you asked about, then to the IP block that this IP is a part of? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenUnderwood Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 abuse[at] adress is updated a few days ago: http://www.abuse.net/lookup.phtml?DOMAIN=ruweb.net But SpamCop is still using the wrong address: http://www.spamcop.net/sc?action=showroute...19;typecodes=17 How to update it? 29819[/snapback] From that second link: Reports routes for 84.252.146.19: routeid:14813084 84.252.146.0 - 84.252.147.255 to:andrey<at>ruweb.net Administrator found from whois records and doing a refresh for the lookup: Removing old cache entries. Tracking details Display data: "whois 84.252.146.19[at]whois.arin.net" (Getting contact from whois.arin.net ) Redirect to ripe Display data: "whois 84.252.146.19[at]whois.ripe.net" (Getting contact from whois.ripe.net) cham-ripe = andrey<at>ruweb.net whois.ripe.net 84.252.146.19 = andrey<at>ruweb.net whois: 84.252.146.0 - 84.252.147.255 = andrey<at>ruweb.net Routing details for 84.252.146.19 Using last resort contacts andrey<at>ruweb.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff G. Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 It appears that the following info needs to be flushed from SpamCop's Route Database: routeid:14817611 84.252.146.0 - 84.252.147.255 to:andrey[at]ruweb.net Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenUnderwood Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 It appears that the following info needs to be flushed from SpamCop's Route Database: 29829[/snapback] I just went back and refreshed (from the reporting side) and got: Removing old cache entries. Tracking details Display data: "whois 84.252.146.19[at]whois.arin.net" (Getting contact from whois.arin.net ) Redirect to ripe Display data: "whois 84.252.146.19[at]whois.ripe.net" (Getting contact from whois.ripe.net) cham-ripe = andrey<at>ruweb.net whois.ripe.net 84.252.146.19 = andrey<at>ruweb.net whois: 84.252.146.0 - 84.252.147.255 = andrey<at>ruweb.net Routing details for 84.252.146.19 De-referencing andrey<at>ruweb.net abuse net ruweb.net = abuse<at>ruweb.net Using best contacts abuse<at>ruweb.net So it looks like you are in business. Good luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wazoo Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 Odd that at least three of us did the Refresh thing with no effect (cached data remained) .. but the screwball Chinese items don't get handled the same way ..??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff G. Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 A Deputy had a hand in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff G. Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 Per email from Ellen: We do not use abuse.net when there is a non-role address as the contact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wazoo Posted July 1, 2005 Share Posted July 1, 2005 That's exactly the thing I was looking for but couldn't find. Somewhere, there was the logic of what addresses were used and which got ignored, but ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.