Jump to content

I started to cry when I see the sad news.


email
 Share

Recommended Posts

:(

SpamCop hello !

I am the sysadmin of dns.com.cn .

our mail server ip always come into blocking list recently

can you tell me cause. is virus or aotoreply?

please remove our ip from your block list as soon as possible.

our ip is 218.244.47.25

218.244.47.26

218.244.47.27

218.244.47.43

218.30.114.33

218.30.114.34

218.30.114.35

Link to comment
Share on other sites

our ip is 218.244.47.25

218.244.47.26

218.244.47.27

218.244.47.43

218.30.114.33

218.30.114.34

218.30.114.35

On this page:http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=blcheck&ip=218.244.47.25

All of the other IP addresses are smiliar:

218.244.47.25 listed in bl.spamcop.net (127.0.0.2)

If there are no reports of ongoing objectionable email from this system it will be delisted automatically in approximately 4 hours.

Causes of listing

System has sent mail to SpamCop spam traps in the past week (spam traps are secret, no reports or evidence are provided by SpamCop)

There are some user reports which seem to indicate you are bouncing undeliverable messages to the forged sender address instead of rejecting the messages during the SMTP process. Please see Misdirected auto replies on: http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?218.30.114.33

Report History:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submitted: Friday, June 30, 2006 12:58:26 PM -0400:

Nightsun Company

1819934039 ( http://www.nightsun.net/ ) To: postmaster[at]aruba.it

1819934032 ( http://www.nightsun.net/ ) To: abuse[at]aruba.it

1819934022 ( 218.30.114.33 ) To: spamcop[at]imaphost.com

1819934006 ( http://www.nightsun.com.cn/ ) To: bjnic[at]bjtelecom.net

1819933988 ( 218.30.114.33 ) To: bjnic[at]bjtelecom.net

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submitted: Monday, June 26, 2006 3:41:11 AM -0400:

failure notice

1812728471 ( 218.30.114.33 ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submitted: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 10:47:06 AM -0400:

failure notice

1814928093 ( 218.30.114.35 ) To: bjnic[at]bjtelecom.net

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submitted: Friday, June 23, 2006 2:34:44 AM -0400:

failure notice

1808028272 ( 218.30.114.35 ) To: uube[at]devnull.spamcop.net

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On a quick check of several of the addresses, Google Abuse Groups appear to have no recent data on mainstream spam sightings...

FWIW, over the last few years, I've noticed a steadily declining likelihood that any given spam source will be reported in the "news.admin.net-abuse.sightings" group. I don't have any statistical evidence, but when I used to run a source IP through a Google Groups search, it would often result in hits to that group. Now, when I do so, I rarely see any hits. My guess is that there are fewer people reporting, or that that they don't represent as diverse a sample as they used to.

My point is therefore, that a "clean" Google Groups search is pretty meaningless now. YMMV

DT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that with trojaned machines being the primary spam source, listings in Abuse Groups has lost value. It's one thing when you used to be able to point out a shady provider who was giving shelter to spammers. Now, you're just listing some number in a Verizon/Comcast/SBC dialup pool with a poisoned customer. Loses the impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...