SPAMCOP HOME · SPAMCOP FAQ · NEWSGROUPS · FORUM FAQ · WEBMAIL · SSL WEBMAIL · SPAMCOPWIKI


 Other words, data, places -->  SpamCop Pages V  FAQs & Words V  Newsgroups V  WebMail V  News-Recent Stuff V   Poll on menu

------>------> Latest and Current Announcements <------<------

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> This is a User to User Support Forum

The primary mode of support here is peer-to-peer, meaning users helping other users. (please remember this at all times!)
Another try:
This forum is composed of people who have used spamcop and those who are learning about anti-spam efforts.

8 Pages V  1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> MASSIVE LAWSUIT AGAINST SCOTT RICHTER..., w/ FTC's help. Submit your interest here
HillsCap
post May 12 2004, 03:22 AM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 90
Joined: 1-February 04
Member No.: 160



Hi, all.

Since Scott Richter is suing SpamCop to stop them from blocking his spam, I say it's time to strike back against this evil SOB, and protect the SpamCop service which has kept our Inboxes relatively unmolested for so long.

Here's my plan:

I want everyone interested in participating in a lawsuit against Richter to register their interest by posting to this thread.

Then, we'll all compile our Richter spams, submit them to the FTC along with depositions, and have the FTC take Richter to court. There would be no cost to any of you except for the time required to fill out the deposition and print out the spam source code of each spam from Richter. The FTC will even pay for FedEx'ing the stuff back to them.

I'm looking for at least 1,000 people, so let's all pitch in and bring this scumbag down. If you know of anyone using SpamCop who doesn't regularly frequent these forums, and they're interested in participating, let them know to come here to register their interest.

After I've got the requisite number of people willing to fill out depositions, I'll get in touch with my contact at the FTC, and provide you all with the information necessary to send your depositions and spam printouts to her (contact name, address, FedEx shipping number, etc.).

Let's get to it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dra007
post May 12 2004, 06:02 AM
Post #2


Been There
Group Icon

Group: Memberp
Posts: 1439
Joined: 18-March 04
Member No.: 777



As I said in the other thread, start a petition that feeds to a webside and spreads around as chain e-mail. Fastest way to reach many people. We can also send similar petitions to FDA and any government agency we can find.

This post has been edited by dra007: May 12 2004, 08:23 AM
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ralsky's Fatal Tumor
post May 12 2004, 07:37 AM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 71
Joined: 29-January 04
Member No.: 110



QUOTE(HillsCap @ May 12 2004, 03:22 AM)
I want everyone interested in participating in a lawsuit against Richter to register their interest by posting to this thread.




Done, done DONE!

But I have two thoughts -

First, I think that a lot of people will come here and think "I'm not going to register for an account on a forum just to post a 'me too!' message." A website would be a much better way to attract attention. Although, now that I think about it, why don't we just take a page from Snotty's playbook. Let's buy an email list from some spammers and make this a opt-out class action suit. Anybody who doesn't want to sue Snotty can just email us and be removed from the list. (Or should we make it a double-un-opt-out list, just to make sure we're operating ethically?) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

Second, how do we determine what's coming from Opt-In? I've never received an email that explicitly said it was coming from them. Are there other signs I should look for, or am I just the one person on the planet that Snotty doesn't know about?

Either way, faster pussycat... kill! KILL! I want to be there to sow the ground with salt after they bulldoze Opt-In, just to make sure nothing grows there again.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Miss Betsy
post May 12 2004, 08:00 AM
Post #4


T-shirt wearing out
Group Icon

Group: Membersph
Posts: 3336
Joined: 2-February 04
Member No.: 174



When Paetec sued Monster Hut (and also the NY AG), they asked for affidavits. The request came in response to a report.

I am not sure whether I have received any Scott Richter spam either. I don't keep my spam usually (though I have a bunch from someone else - just in case someone ever sues them!)

Can't take the time now tp answer - but there must be a better way than chain emails!

Miss Betsy


--------------------
an almost new internet user
if you don't think your post has been answered sufficiently, please email service[at]admin.spamcop.net
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dra007
post May 12 2004, 08:26 AM
Post #5


Been There
Group Icon

Group: Memberp
Posts: 1439
Joined: 18-March 04
Member No.: 777



I have enough webspace for a site dedicated to a petition.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
HillsCap
post May 12 2004, 09:00 AM
Post #6


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 90
Joined: 1-February 04
Member No.: 160



OK, I've set up an email account at Yahoo specifically for this...

StopSnottyScotty[at]yahoo.com

dra007, I've got DreamweaverMX and I'm a whiz at HTML, so if you've got the space for a webpage, I can whip up a page with an explanation of what our goals are.

Ralsky's Fatal Tumor, my thinking was that people would naturally be suspicious of leaving their email addresses with me (or with any of us, since they don't know us and don't know if they can trust us with their email addresses), so I figured "Who would they trust? Well, SpamCop itself!"

So, I think we'd get a higher percentage of people signing up to register their interest here, rather than leaving their email address with any of us.

If we can't gather at least 1000 people, then it's not really worth going to the FTC, as the damages that can be shown wouldn't be large enough to take Richter down for good. Once we get 1000 people, I'll give the contact details for my contact at the FTC, you all can either call or email her, she can send out the depositions and give you the FedEx shipping number.

A website is a good idea, but we still need some means of communication between us and the people who are interested. Again, I don't think we'll get a large number of people giving out their email addresses, so that's why I went with this forum.

This post has been edited by HillsCap: May 12 2004, 09:10 AM
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Merlyn
post May 12 2004, 09:13 AM
Post #7


Been There
Group Icon

Group: Memberp
Posts: 1653
Joined: 23-January 04
Member No.: 25



Does anyone remember the movie, Miracle on 34th street? When Santa Clause was on trial the defense had the postoffice deliver sacks and sacks of postal mail addressed to Santa Clause to court which is what won the case and he was declaired the real Santa.

What would happen if IronPort brought in sacks and sacks of postal mail sent to them with a hardcop of every single piece of spam Scotty Snooty sent them with a disclaimer saying it was never opted in for? I am talking millions of letters?

What could the judge say then? Scotty is saying millions have asked for it but in reality millions would say they didn't. Sure would make a liar look like a liar (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)


--------------------
Regards,
Merlyn
A Spamcop advocate
People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoided!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ralsky's Fatal Tumor
post May 12 2004, 09:19 AM
Post #8


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 71
Joined: 29-January 04
Member No.: 110



QUOTE(HillsCap @ May 12 2004, 09:00 AM)

I think we'd get a higher percentage of people signing up to register their interest here, rather than leaving their email address with any of us.




Good point - I hadn't thought of it that way. Keep us up to date with any info.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
HillsCap
post May 12 2004, 09:33 AM
Post #9


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 90
Joined: 1-February 04
Member No.: 160



Merlyn wrote:
[What would happen if IronPort brought in sacks and sacks of postal mail sent to them with a hardcop of every single piece of spam Scotty Snooty sent them with a disclaimer saying it was never opted in for? I am talking millions of letters?]


Exactly what I'm aiming for... except it won't be IronPort or SpamCop walking in with wheelbarrows of printed-out spam along with depositions, it'll be the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Government. Now how can a judge argue with that?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Merlyn
post May 12 2004, 09:40 AM
Post #10


Been There
Group Icon

Group: Memberp
Posts: 1653
Joined: 23-January 04
Member No.: 25



QUOTE(HillsCap @ May 12 2004, 10:33 AM)
Merlyn wrote:
[What would happen if IronPort brought in sacks and sacks of postal mail sent to them with a hardcop of every single piece of spam Scotty Snooty sent them with a disclaimer saying it was never opted in for? I am talking millions of letters?]


Exactly what I'm aiming for... except it won't be IronPort or SpamCop walking in with wheelbarrows of printed-out spam along with depositions, it'll be the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Government. Now how can a judge argue with that?

That would be good but I think the court of public opinion would work just as good, then the FTC could "borrow" that info and Scotty could then have some more fun.


--------------------
Regards,
Merlyn
A Spamcop advocate
People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoided!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ralsky's Fatal Tumor
post May 12 2004, 10:21 AM
Post #11


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 71
Joined: 29-January 04
Member No.: 110



HillsCap - have you considered submitting this as a story to Slashot? There are lots of sysadmins and spam-hating folks there who'd probably sign on in a heartbeat.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
turetzsr
post May 12 2004, 11:40 AM
Post #12


T-shirt wearing out
Group Icon

Group: Membersph
Posts: 3712
Joined: 26-January 04
From: Michigan USA
Member No.: 59



...Please see My reply to "Scott the spammer Richter".


--------------------
..Regards,
...Steve T

...A Happy SpamCop.net user (not an employee)
...Please avoid replying via e-mail, as it is not secure
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ross
post May 12 2004, 12:12 PM
Post #13


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 16-March 04
Member No.: 752



Count me in. But how can I be sure some of my spam is from OptInRealBig?

Ross Combs
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
chuckpint
post May 12 2004, 12:21 PM
Post #14


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 12-May 04
Member No.: 1487



I'd be very interested in helping. And just to test whether or not OptInRealBig honors opt-out, I just put a brand-new never used email address into their opt-out form. If I get any email at that address, I'll be taking that up with the FTC big time. I'll also post the spam here so people can identify it.

The most common question being asked here is "how can I tell if the email came from OptInRealBig?". We all need to be sure the spam comes from them if we want any complaint to have any weight. Their page does have information to identify their servers.

Chuck Pint
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Merlyn
post May 12 2004, 12:26 PM
Post #15


Been There
Group Icon

Group: Memberp
Posts: 1653
Joined: 23-January 04
Member No.: 25



QUOTE(chuckpint @ May 12 2004, 01:21 PM)
Their page does have information to identify their servers.

Chuck Pint

And you are going to believe a spammer?

Remember rule #1.


--------------------
Regards,
Merlyn
A Spamcop advocate
People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoided!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
schmoe
post May 12 2004, 12:45 PM
Post #16


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 12-May 04
Member No.: 1490



Sign me up too, but as has been previously asked, how can we tell which spam is from this group? It would be great to have a page of known-spam to compare against... perhaps the SpamCop folks can cobble something together quickly.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kd3bj
post May 12 2004, 01:00 PM
Post #17


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 12-May 04
Member No.: 1492



Sounds good to me. I'll help any way I can. I run an ISP and we estimate that we spend about $100 per customer per month for spam defense. I don't know what fraction is from any one particular spammer, but we could figure that out.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Merlyn
post May 12 2004, 01:01 PM
Post #18


Been There
Group Icon

Group: Memberp
Posts: 1653
Joined: 23-January 04
Member No.: 25



QUOTE(schmoe @ May 12 2004, 01:45 PM)
Sign me up too, but as has been previously asked, how can we tell which spam is from this group?  It would be great to have a page of known-spam to compare against... perhaps the SpamCop folks can cobble something together quickly.

You can always check the headers for the following IP's

69.6.0.0/18
69.6.64.0/20
69.15.83.16/28
206.165.164.128/26
66.179.100.178/32
66.179.100.128/25
66.179.17.160/27
66.45.41.136/29
66.45.41.192/32
66.45.80.80/29
206.161.120.64/26
66.129.88.100/31
66.129.88.100/30
65.168.54.0/23
80.77.34.128/25
65.60.16.10/32
69.6.21.0/24


--------------------
Regards,
Merlyn
A Spamcop advocate
People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoided!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
billstewart
post May 12 2004, 01:03 PM
Post #19


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 12-May 04
Member No.: 1489



Recognizing OptinRealBig Spam
It's pretty easy to recognize many of Scotty's canned meat products.
Unlike many other spammers, Scotty pretends to be legitimate, and sends out mail from his domains and IP addresses when he can. <p>
IP addresses 69.6.0.0/20 belong to Scotty, and if you read the lawsuit, you'll see Abovenet notifying Optigate that they refuse to accept route advertisements for those addresses because of the level of complaints. <p>
Domain name moosq.com is also Scotty's - Most of the spam comes from machines named [some-number].moosq.com. It's usually in the From line. Most of the mail I've gotten from Scotty has at least one header line (I think it's the From:?) that has a long string encoding your user name (usually SHOUTING IN ALL CAPS) and probably some information about which spam this was) @ [number].moosq.com . My spam logs used to get lots of mail from them, addressed to three of my email addresses (two of which I *never* use for the public, including one that's been dead for N years and clearly came from web harvesting.) I haven't checked the log lately, but there were dozens in the last two weeks. <p>
OptinRealBig sometimes shows up in their email bodies, but I don't keep that in my log files so I don't know how often.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
zav
post May 12 2004, 01:18 PM
Post #20


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 12-May 04
Member No.: 1493



Spamcop exists to free us from unwanted solicitation ala email.

It protects us from fraudulent spam and repeated unwelcome solicitations.

My email box is a private location which should be protected from people trying to push their interests and separate me from my money. I wish for NO commercial solicitations in my email box unless we have an agreement ahead of time that there is an interest for this. This does not mean that everyone in the world who wants to sell me something, award me my Nigerian millions, expand me penis OR breasts, refinance my house which I do not own, get me drugs that I do not need, etc, etc, etc can try to contact me through my email box to ask for this permission.

Spamcop is all we've got to protect OUR interests and OUR email boxes from crooks, practicers of fraud, anyone who wants to sell anything, or flood OUR boxes with THEIR stuff.

I conduct BUSINESS through my email.
I TALK to my FRIENDS through my email.
This is MY EMAIL BOX.

I want it PROTECTED from unwelcome intrusions by corporate entities EXACTLY LIKE that of Scott Richter's Opt In Real Big. He should be prosecuted for attempting to jeopardize OUR privacy with his actions against Spamcop.

Legal actions by spammers or email-marketers to impinge OUR rights and OUR privacy can not stand.

- Alex Zavatone
San Francisco, USA.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

8 Pages V  1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 6th September 2010 - 12:18 AM