Lking

You mailost configuration will/should not affect where your notifications are emailed. It does affect whether you report servers in you email path - not a good thing. No there is not a known limit. I report spam received by several accounts on several servers. I have more than 10 host/domains listed. Other people have their email forwarded through several (more than one) servers, each which adds an entry in the list Have you checked Change Email address or name under the Preference tab? I have not heard of these preferences changing, but in the long run bits can randomly change. If all looks OK let us know.

problems with OUTLOOK is ongoing. Have you searched for "OutLook" using the search tool in the upper right of this page?

This post was moved from "Blocklist Help" Not to quibble over definitions, but given you participation over the last 15 years, the notifications are not spam. If you would like to change your notification choices you can make changes by: Click on your account name in the upper right hand corner of this screen In the drop down menu, click on <Account Settings> In the Settings screen, in the right hand column click on <notification settings> On he Notification Settings screen, there are several options you can select or not After making you selections be sure to click the <Save> button located near the bottom center of the screen. I hope this has been helpful.

To follow on what petzl posted. There are two paths here 1) Stop the spam out right. As petzl posted, IF the abuse desk/ISP a good member of the internet or the cost of too many report gets to high, the ISP can stop the spam from the IPs they control. Yes, the spammer can just fine somewhere else host there spamming but that is life 2) spam traps, analysis or reported spam add to some block list, spamassin, spamCop, or who ever. For any blocklist to have an affect on your email, some ISP or node in your path must use that blocklist Depending on where you report your spam you may help one or both approaches. one or both may affect spam you receive. As a bonus you may get washed off the spammers list.

Understand that. There are times when I just trow away some examples. Looking at some of my current spam it looks like the last "Content-Type:" may be out of place. I would suggest after you past in the spam, insert a blank line after the "To: undisclosed-recipients:;" line. Just a suggestion. The parser should still see you email address in the Bcc line in the body and "x" it.

I was hopeful

Let me expand on my shorthand reply Yes, (If I had received the email you received), I would report this (email as) spam. My apologies for any offense perceived in my comments. None was intended. Life is to short.

Yes I would report this spam.

In the body of the emial <DIV><a style=3D"color: blue; background-color: ffffdd" href=3D"http://www.nospammer.net/SpamSubmission/SubmitSpam?id=3DI3QGAH0GXWB= nRmpfeUJ0RQ__&sig=3De340MBnYVsRoIzFtaiVlcHl4NCx2MTNwEzZfBg__"> If this email is not spam, click here to submit the signatures to FortiGuar= d - AntiSpam Service. </a></DIV> as indicated in the report

The issue is two different but related problems. As you may have noticed there is a difference between the base domain, "SpamCop.net" and the SUB domain "forum.spamcop.net' SpamCop.net is perhaps the more stable of the two. However, when SpamCop was bough by Cisco maintenance of the user interface became a lower priority. In fairness, before the change in ownership there were issues with dead links to the forum were creeping into SpamCop.net (as I remember). The forum is a somewhat different issue of evolution. The forum has always been a user volunteer supported operation. Volunteers have had varying degrees of access, control and time given to the forum. With the changing "personal" several initiatives to improve/structure the wealth of information and history in the forum have been started and abandoned. Add to this the need to change the underlying software forum software and database has resulted in an uncounted number of broken links. All a sad but true result of an irregularly maintained system that is +40(?) years old.

You might try stop-spoofing@amazon.com

Don't forget to leave the reuired blank line at the end of the header

True story.. My error.

The way the system works is sometimes confusing. When you are logged in to SpamCop and follow a tracking URL to look at a report you see the un munged report. If you log out and follow the tracking URL, you will see the munged report others see as RubiBue reported above.

Rule #3: Spammers are stupid. "Hay fellow spammers here is a validated email address!" How do you know it is valid? " They reported my email (spam) to this address"

Sorry about the tags. mindless error on my part.

Perhaps others do, I do not.

Different block list, different objectives, different rules.

I don't think that configuration of you mailhost is the cause of that problem. From your OP I take it that you are using the SC web form to submit. What mail application are you using to get the spam? Some do not give you the header without modification, which causes the reported problem.

When the "Reporting Time" was added to the screen, there were lots of threads about the accuracy. Seems to fall to 2 hrs and sticks there. And why should they??? They don's SEND any spam. Remember the objective of the SCBL is to block/filter incoming spam, not rate all the IP in the world. In the beginning spammers would include phony links to NY Times/ Washington Post, etc. to make it look like the spamvertised product was valid. A dynamic process. Thanks. I am fairly sure that in spite of the view from your end of the "fire hose" 1k - 100k others are receiving spam for the same IP, it only takes a couple of live reports. And of course there are all the spam traps which are heavily weighted..

Lets start with the SCBL deals with IP addresses not domain names. As for which IPs are blocked, have you looked at https://www.spamcop.net/spamstats.shtml or https://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/351.html Have you looked at https://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/297.html scroll down to "Rules" Speed all depends.

Of course anything over two days old will be rejected by SC

That is it. For next time you should take a look at some of the older post if this forum to see what has become the defacto standard format. Look at "Ethyl's" ( C2H5OH ) as a long time contributor.

The header end with the first blank line. From: "Lisette Neira" <lneira@century-group.com> Reply-To: "Lisette Neira" <reply_lozwwn_esqpwiya_o@cp20.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html;charset=Windows-1252 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAABgr/Be80R5mPNEkVeDRJFXE0SOroNEkVdw== X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrNqMTGxcIABLo3o6bFGiyYxWmx78B3FgdGj+Mv3jMFMEZx+OWXKAQXJOYmcGT07L7AVsBQAaIaGBlWMcrnlpYbFmckFpckJhYVpxelpuYVFOWn6JblGoCA0SZGqOE7GLdflDnFKCklzpsQMS1WSKAYaGBGaV5JalF8UWlOavErRnEORiVh3pkgWZ7MvJLizHSYjAQHk5IIr03U5FghXqBNCCmpBkar1Lv51bzrtwc9u+OfzT/fM680kaG/U3mraYz/EqZ3R+Lm7JNg6z909lqu7TtluzYj7wkXZ2S/S07ieFe/33L7Lc8mpwJZu5uyYYEu2nEqOvx+s3/0eu4qvc/QKeJ55GLw3QsTfmavV5X5LLAnUPSUnMmPHfqnuOeHnv9xwYLDaMKWtwxKHkosQO8bajEXFScCAMcuQddOAQAA <!-- X-Campaign: 38293016/84269892/21719015952 --> <style> .dvPreheader { display: none !important; mso-hide: all; }</style><div class="dvPreheader" style="display: none !important; mso-hide:all;">This month's sample of our top talent currently available for new opportunities. Contact me today to learn more.</div>

When using the web form to submit spam, after pasting the spam in the box and clicking <Process spam> the tracking URL is at the top of the next screen.