C2H5OH Posted March 25, 2014 Posted March 25, 2014 I probably missed the announcement, so can anyone remind me why the historical traffic volume graphs seem not to have updated since last October?
SpamCopAdmin Posted March 25, 2014 Posted March 25, 2014 Can you post a link to the graph you're talking about? It looks to me like the graphs were all updated today. - Don D'Minion - SpamCop Admin - - Service[at]Admin.SpamCop.net -
Geek Posted March 25, 2014 Posted March 25, 2014 Maybe clear your cache? I'm running a painfully old browser (FF3.0.6 .... don't ask >_<) and it shows up-to-date
lisati Posted March 25, 2014 Posted March 25, 2014 I believe the OP is referring to the graphs accessible here: http://www.spamcop.net/spamstats.shtml They look stuck from my end too.
Farelf Posted March 25, 2014 Posted March 25, 2014 Yes, those at http://www.spamcop.net/spamstats.shtml - such as http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamstats - are stuck. Mentioned in http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?...ost&p=87139 Wasn't too concerned at the time (and we have the alternatives viewed through the forum, sourced from http://delta2.cesmail.net/graphs/spamstats.png etc.) but it has been a while now ... grateful if you could get someone to poke it Don.
C2H5OH Posted March 26, 2014 Author Posted March 26, 2014 Thanks all for clearing that up. I'll use the link from the forum page instead. Don't know why I didn't check that first...
DavidT Posted March 26, 2014 Posted March 26, 2014 ... grateful if you could get someone to poke it Don. While you're at it, Don, you might get someone to edit the copyright tag that gets pulled via SHTML--it still says: © 2013 Cisco Systems, Inc. DT
C2H5OH Posted April 2, 2014 Author Posted April 2, 2014 Graphs being updated again. Thanks to whoever sorted it!
Farelf Posted April 2, 2014 Posted April 2, 2014 So they are! Thanks for confirming, thanks to the staff for fixing it. Marking resolved though I note the additional matter of the copyright date as appearing on other SC website pages remains resolutely "2013".
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.